Yesterday, UK voters elected to leave the European Union (EU) – the “Brexit”. As a result, market volatility has increased sharply. While the “Brexit” referendum won last night, the process of leaving will be long and arduous. Many are predicting that it will take more than two years. So the sell-off today is more so about the uncertainty that comes with “now what!?!”
Expect continued volatility and wild swings as it will take time to sort all of this out, but long term we feel that this has the potential to create extremely attractive buying opportunities. There’s no real change in the way the United States will do business, and, in reality, while there will be some growing pains, the UK was really just a fringe member of the EU anyways. It had its own currency, immigration laws, and a laundry list of exemptions from EU rules.
Here’s how our accounts are positioned: Over the past few months we have been raising cash across accounts by cutting equity exposure as the stock market hovered around all-time highs. We felt that the downside risk of being heavily invested in the stock market far outweighed the potential upside. While arguably “early”, we did this in anticipation of a pull-back. With the “Brexit” vote, it appears that we may be getting the decline and potential entry point that we have been waiting for to put that cash to work. As the next few months start to provide more clarity, we plan to capitalize on attractive investment opportunities created by the decline. In addition to lower equity exposure, we are well positioned within our bond and alternative allocations.
Important things to remember:
Uncertainty about what’s next will continue, therefore, so will volatility.
We’ve been raising cash and are more conservatively positioned than we have been in years.
This news and the subsequent downward move has the potential of creating extremely attractive buying opportunities to put that cash to work.
“V” is for the volatility that the market experienced in the first quarter. It’s also the shape which the S&P formed over that same time period. The first half of the quarter consisted of wild daily swings and a sharp decline (down 11%), while wild daily swings and a subsequent sharp increase (up 13%) made up the second half. Despite all of the crazy movements, the S&P 500 ended right about where it started, +1.30%.
It was a crazy first quarter and an extremely tough one for investment managers. Nearly 80% of Large Cap mutual funds underperformed the S&P 500, and unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like the backdrop for the second quarter will get any easier. Despite the volatility, and the sharp reversal to the upside, the same fears and issues remain: oil price volatility, global slowdown fears, Fed uncertainty, China destabilization, and presidential election uncertainty. Because things have yet to paint a clearer picture, our strategy largely remains unchanged.
As we enter 2016, we remain mindful that we are in the 7th year of a strong bull market, and as the length of its run grows longer, emotions rather than sound advice and fundamentals tend to drive prices. Volatile price swings in both directions become commonplace and markets move counter to common sense. While difficult during times like this, it’s important to stay disciplined in your strategy and continue to focus on longer term investment objectives.
While the trajectory of returns since the March 2009 bottom is unsustainable, we believe that markets can and will continue upward. This doesn’t mean that there won’t be volatility, but people tend to forget that before we hit highs in 2013, the market, on a price basis, had been flat for 13 years. It’s only been 2 1/2 years since that record high, and if history repeats itself, which it tends to do in the investment world, the bull still has room to run.
Most of our clients know we are big believers in low cost investing with passive investment vehicles. Although it is easy to grasp the concept of paying lower costs, it is harder to grasp that you can pay lower costs and also outperform most other investments.
The most recent SPIVA report, published by Standard & Poor’s, is now available. In 2014, over 86% of mutual fund managers (large cap) underperformed their benchmarks. Although this makes a pretty good case for investing in indexes (ETFs), mutual funds still outnumber ETFs by 10 to 1, based on assets under management.
Pundits used to argue that inefficient asset classes could outperform the market, but as you can see in the report, it is pretty standard across the board, active management loses over nearly every time period and asset class!
For the most part, there is a reason as to why a Bank or Brokerage firm puts a mutual fund in your account – FEES. Whether it’s through being paid directly by offering up a propriety product or through revenue sharing by allowing another fund family to participate on their platform, Brokerage firms have found a way to legally double dip on your account. The adviser makes his commission or asset management fee for managing the account, and then the institution makes its fee from the mutual fund. This is a very lucrative, but far from objective practice endeavored upon by most large brokerage firms. Most clients have no idea what is going on. This is because the conflict of interest is only revealed to them in tiny print on the back page of a prospectus, which is rarely read. If the firm does have proprietary funds, many hide the affiliation by naming the fund family something that is hard to trace back to the parent company.
“No Man’s life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session” -Mark Twain
Over the past week, Neil and I have received many questions about the government shutdown and impending debt ceiling and how they might affect the markets. So we thought we would share with you a quick summary of what we believe is happening and how we are positioning our portfolios as a result.
